Unified Field Force: The Electric Force is the only Force in Nature....

[Gravock]

Gravitational waves have yet to be detected. Because gravitons do not have a spin, when they cross the threshold on time into antitime, their rotation is uneffectd, and thus, still attractive. Antimatter is still attracted to matter via gravitation, as well as charge. If this were not the case, antimatter would weigh less than matter, and ths is not the case, as the gravitational effect from rest mass is the same.

Wrong! Gravitational waves haven't been detected because we're not oscillating between forward and reverse time. The graviton is a theoretical particle, which physics have failed in finding along with the hypothetical Higgs boson. So, they haven't detected gravitational waves, the hypothetical graviton, or the hypothetical higgs boson. Maybe it's because they're working under the wrong assumptions, such as gravity is only an attraction force, or maybe they want us to work under these wrong assumptions? According to Xydous, the electron and positron has an unknown repulsive coulomb force. Both the electron and positron must be accelerated at or above 0.62c before they have enough momentum to over come the unknown repulsive coulomb force and annihilate each other. You'll also need to explain why a thin belt of antimatter is found orbiting the earth.

This thin belt of antimatter shouldn't exist on the outer edges of the earth if it was effected by gravity in the same way as matter because they would immediately be annihilated. You'll also need to explain why there is no measurable electric field in a magnet, which physics have failed to do. It can't be done when you separate the electron-positron into separate and different particles. However, it is easily explained when one views the electron-positron as being one. The observations of lensing indicate that a quantum theory of gravity, based on gravitons interacting with every particle including individual photons, cannot be correct if gravity is only an attractive force. You've been bamboozled and hoodwinked by TPTB. If you want to subscribe to their false doctrine, then be my guest. If this is the case, then this thread isn't for you.

Gravock

[Gravock]

Josh Zeiler,

One more thing. You're confusing the graviton with the higgs boson. A graviton has a theoretical spin-2, while the higgs boson has a theoretical spin-0. In addition to this, who's to say the only way for a frequency and/or polarity reversal is a change in it's spin? Why couldn't it turn itself inside out or use some other mechanism to achieve this? You don't seem to be very open-minded. Now, I'm going to say this one more time. The G-forces are cancelled in the description of the wormhole I provided. Accept it, and move on.

Gravock

In physics, the graviton is a hypothetical elementary particle that mediates the force of gravitation in the framework of quantum field theory. If it exists, the graviton must be massless (because the gravitational force has unlimited range) and must be a spin 2 boson.

The Standard Model completely fixes the properties of the Higgs boson, except for its mass. It is expected to have no spin and no electric or color charge, and it interacts with other particles through weak interaction and Yukawa interactions.

[Gravock]

Josh Zeiler,

You tried to throw the graviton at me, and you were unsuccessful. I already know what you're going to throw at me next. You're going to throw the higgs boson (mass) at me. Before you do, let me put an end to this debate. The wormhole which I previously described is the same as being in free-fall, thus there is no G-forces. There is no 'weight per unit mass'.

Gravock

The g-force associated with an object in its acceleration relative to free-fall. This acceleration experienced by an object is due to the vector sum of non-gravitational forces acting on an object free to move. The accelerations that are not produced by gravity are termed proper accelerations, and it is only these that are measured in g-force units. They cause stresses and strains on objects, which are felt as weight (any g-force can thus be simply described, and measured, as a "weight per unit mass"). Because of these strains (weight forces), large proper accelerations (large g-forces), may be destructive.

Free fall is any motion of a body where gravity is the only force acting upon it, at least initially. These conditions produce an inertial trajectory so long as gravity remains the only force. Since this definition does not specify velocity, it also applies to objects initially moving upward. Since free fall in the absence of forces other than gravity produces weightlessness or "zero-g," sometimes any condition of weightlessness due to inertial motion is referred to as free-fall. This may also apply to weightlessness produced because the body is far from a gravitating body.

[Gravock]

One last note. Regardless of an object's mass, it will undergo the same acceleration rate in gravity. So, if we have an object with 0 mass or we have an object with a very heavy mass, it makes no difference in our acceleration rate in free-fall due to gravity or a wormhole. Mass is simply not a factor! Why do people automatically assume anti-gravity is related to a decrease or elimination in an object's mass? Gravity isn't related with an object's mass, so why would anti-gravity be related to mass? It's not related at all. It has to do with an objects weight and not an objects mass. In free-fall you have no weight. I hope weight and mass doesn't get confused in this discussion like the graviton and the higgs boson.

Gravock

[waitedavidmsphysics]

One last note. Regardless of an object's mass, it will undergo the same acceleration rate in gravity. So, if we have an object with 0 mass or we have an object with a very heavy mass, it makes no difference in our acceleration rate in free-fall due to gravity or a wormhole. Mass is simply not a factor! Why do people automatically assume anti-gravity is related to a decrease or elimination in an object's mass? Gravity isn't related with an increase in an object's mass, so why would anti-gravity be related to mass? It's not related at all. It has to do with an objects weight and not an objects mass. In free-fall you have no weight. I hope weight and mass doesn't get confused in this discussion like the graviton and the higgs boson.

Gravock

As long as the test mass has insignificant impact itself on the spacetime geometry that is essentially true. Any test mass in free fall will follow a geodesic and the geodesic will be due only to the gravitation of other masses if the test mass itself has an insignificant impact on the spacetime. However, when you consider the impact your mass has on the spacetime geometry things get more interesting. Lets say hypothetically for example that you could find some negative mass and set in near a positive mass of equal magnitude. The exact solution for the mass dipole isn't easy to get but conceptually its not hard to picture what happens. The positive mass will accelerate everything toward it including the negative mass, and the negative mass will accelerate everything away from it including the positive mass and as a result the system would accelerate. This may not be what most people mean by anti-gravity, but it would be a form of gravitational propultion. Now take a test mass and put it between the two. It would accelerate in the same direction as the system. Though you may not be able to find any such negative mass, it turns out that the source term for Einstein's field equations isn't merely a mass, but is energy momentum pressure and stress, all described by a stress-energy tensor. Even electromagnetic fields have a stress-energy tensor. Now electromagnetic fields do have negative terms in the stress-energy tensor, so the real question is whether such a system can be found as the exact solution to Einstein's field equations for real matter and fields.

[Ioannis]

Ioannis,

I think your electron-positron publication is a true masterpiece. Thanks for sharing.

Gravock

Thank you Gravock!
My work as I wrote in the past does not use complex mathematics and is very straight and readable even for students that have finished High School and have a little more broad knowledge about Physics. I will not try to convince anyone since my work speaks itself. If something is true and related to the truth does not need proofs. Anyway, I am not very often on the forums and I just want to inform you as also the other members of this forum that soon (a week or two) I will be finishing the v3 of my work, which is if you liked the v2, this you are going to love it! Some info about the new version:

i) Four experiments. Three of them to easily detect the Aether and one of them is regarded to neutrinos, their velocity and more....
ii) The nature of neutrinos and electrons
iii) and more

Best Wishes

Ioannis

[Gravock]

Thank you Gravock!

My work as I wrote in the past does not use complex mathematics and is very straight and readable even for students that have finished High School and have a little more broad knowledge about Physics. I will not try to convince anyone since my work speaks itself. If something is true and related to the truth does not need proofs. Anyway, I am not very often on the forums and I just want to inform you as also the other members of this forum that soon (a week or two) I will be finishing the v3 of my work, which is if you liked the v2, this you are going to love it! Some info about the new version:

i) Four experiments. Three of them to easily detect the Aether and one of them is regarded to neutrinos, their velocity and more....
ii) The nature of neutrinos and electrons
iii) and more

Best Wishes

Ioannis

You definitely have my attention with the upcoming release of v3. I appreciate you keeping us updated on your work.

Take care and be safe,

Gravock

[Josh Zeiler]

We're talking about two completely different things. Your talking about antimatter as a pushing force, and I'm talking about it as a reverse time lapse function with the same attractive force of gravity.

[Ioannis]

Hi everyone!
The new version (v3.0) is ready and the new Web Site is already on line. Some of the New discoveries:
1.Aether's Detection by analyzing Magnetic Field Data using only your EXCEL S/W
2.Neutrinos are massless (imaginary particles or longitudinal half waves) and calculation of their corresponding mass from the rotational Energy. For All Neutrinos.
3.Neutrinos Lower and Upper Velocity limit
4.Imaginary Planck constant and Charge
5.Dirac's Magnetic Monopole=Rotational Potential due to the Aether
6.Complete Quantum Magnetic Charge Force
7.Aether is the Psyche of the Universe
8.Aether's Temperature and density

I believe that you will enjoy this version much more than the previous!

Best Wishes

Ioannis

[Ioannis]

http://www.ioannisxydous.gr/